Comic Strip of the Day

CSotD: And Another Thing …

JD Vance seems to be looking forward to the 2028 presidential election. He blamed the Iran war for the Republicans’ sweeping losses, which, as Anderson points out, sure seems like he’s trying to put some distance between himself and Trump.

Will it work? I’d be surprised, particularly since he also said that the problem wasn’t affordability, which I don’t think is going to play with the public. We get back to the two main promises Trump made, to bring prices down and keep us out of new wars. If you want to present yourself as independent of the administration, you have to face the fact that you were elected because of egg prices and your party was rejected because of gas prices.

Pretending you weren’t in the room isn’t gonna play. Ask Hubert Humphrey how having been LBJ’s veep skewed his chances against Nixon in 1968.

If the Republicans want any chance of holding the White House, they’re going to have to at least come up with some different faces, even if they fail to come up with some different policies.

In 2012, after Obama routed Mitt Romney, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal wrote up a report on what the Republicans needed to do to become competitive. The takeaway phrase was that they had to stop being “the Party of Stupid.” They didn’t listen and won eight years in the White House, which isn’t much of an incentive for change.

We’ll see what they come up with in two years, but I’d be surprised if JD had a major role in it.

Juxtaposition of Sore Losers

I’m not sure how old Mike Lester is, but he’s certainly been around long enough to remember the gentle, refined sportsmanship the Republicans exhibited on January 6, 2021. No, they didn’t riot the day after the elections. They waited and attempted a coup when the votes were about to be confirmed, at which point they broke into the Capitol, assaulted police, stole souvenirs, threatened to kill the vice-president and smeared feces on the walls.

Which I shouldn’t have to tell anyone over the age of about 10. In the words of Michael Corleone, “Don’t tell me you’re innocent, because it insults my intelligence and makes me very angry.”

Varvel could have exhibited his islamophobia in a more reasonable way, by showing Iran grateful to have people in power who oppose the war. But he didn’t, and instead used the occasion to demonstrate bigotry. It would be offensive enough from anyone, but for somebody who frequently cites his Christianity in his political cartoons, it’s doubly so, and evidence that his view of Christ ignores the answer Jesus gave to “Who is my neighbor?”

Jesus gave the example of a Samaritan, someone outside the Jewish faith, who helped a mugging victim when others would not. That was his explanation of the second great commandment, “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”

As this explanation of the matter says, “This guiding directive is not presented as optional but as a key form of obedience.”

Schrank offered a pessimistic view of the elections in Israel, and it seemed realistic for his Gazan to despair of anything good coming from them. However, the success of Arab political parties and resistance to Netanyahu seems as if there may be a coalition government with Netanyahu’s rightwing allies out and a combination of moderate parties from both faiths.

There have been demonstrations by moderate Israelis wanting Netanyahu out, and if the proposed coalition comes to power, that Gazan father may find that he spoke too soon.

Gaza, however, is not the only place where Israel is clashing with Arab residents. Wolterink doesn’t pull his punches in criticizing the settlers who, under the shelter of the military, have assaulted West Bank residents, burned their homes and olive orchards and killed livestock in an effort to drive them off the land.

Hajjaj, a Palestinian Jordanian, offers a more touching portrait of a West Bank resident who simply wants to continue his ancient lifestyle of growing olives, and fears the violent settlers, portrayed here as zombies.

It may advance the discussion of matters both on the West Bank and in Gaza if the Jewish/Arab coalition comes together and governs effectively, since it would be harder to dismiss criticism of the government as anti-Semitic.

Meanwhile, what is equally important at the moment is Trump’s decision, announced just before our elections, to end US financial support of Israel. Both he and Netanyahu have said the nation is now in a position to be self-supporting, and while it didn’t help Trump here, it might be a positive there, even for Netanyahu, who seems to be on his way out.

There is talk that Hegseth may be on the brink of being fired, but his view of the military as a testosterone-soaked macho fighting machine had led to a de-emphasis on the drone warfare that Ukraine has been using to keep the Russian bear at bay. He has suddenly awakened to the need for drone development, but it might not be enough to save his job.

As Kal notes, drones are the future of warfare, and both Ukraine and Iran are making use of the new weaponry, which has been compared to the invention of the machine gun. The most effective warriors now are well away from the front, while Russia is losing tens of thousands of soldiers at the front, attacked and killed by drones.

Hegseth’s preferences notwithstanding, survival these days has little to do with pushups and weight-lifting, though his boss has committed to building a type of ship that the Japanese air force mostly knocked out of World War II before the fighting had begun..

Juxtaposition of the Day #2

The next two years are likely to be transitional, with Trump hanging onto power despite a congress with majorities in opposition to him. The interesting question is how things will change with the 2028 elections.

The plutocrats described by Sipress and mocked by Davies may find themselves forced once again to work within confining rules, but I’m confident they’ll still find a way to advance their personal ambitions regardless of the overall costs.

Keep on keeping the faith.

Mike Peterson has posted his "Comic Strip of the Day" column every day since 2010. His opinions are his own, but we welcome comments either agreeing or in opposition.

Previous Post
Some New York Times Readers’ Veyesque Cartoons Revealed
Next Post
Comic Strip News & Reviews

Comments 22

  1. On October 7th, Hamas made a play for a free Palestine “from the River to the sea.” As I told a pro-Palestinian colleague at the time, if Hamas is shouting “from the River to the sea” in Gaza, do not be surprised to find the settlers shouting it in Yesha. This is the mantra that makes a two state solution impossible, and the common goal of Israeli and Arab terrorists alike.

    Oh oopsie! I seem to have forgotten another mantra “one man’s ‘terrorist’ is another man’s ‘freedom fighter.'”

  2. I repeat my mantra: swing voters will not be impressed if Congress spends the next two years holding hearings about what this administration has done and is doing. They’ll be impressed by action designed to improve their lives, and of all humanity. I suppose doing both is possible, but multi-tasking has never seemed to be a strength of either house…or either party.

    1. They will be impressed if the Democratic leadership can get enough Republicans to vote to override Trump’s vetoes.

      that’s three in the Senate and 30 or so in the House.

    2. Poll data is still coming out, but exit polls are starting to indicate that “corruption” was one of the things driving voters toward the Dems. Actually exposing that corruption and holding some people responsible for it very publicly would be pretty satisfying for the average “swing voter”, I would think.

      1. The corruption was blatant…is blatant…but a ton of people were very late in recognizing it. Or perhaps in caring. In any case, the results of those hearing will be tedious and they won’t change a single thing about peoples’ day to day lives. The blatant actions of encouraging a revolutionary riot weren’t enough to convince voters of the direness of our country’s position. If the economy and everyday lives of that 5% of the population that decide elections isn’t noticeably improved, or that failure can’t be laid at the feet of the Republican party, we could very well swing back to the same situation we are in now.

      2. You’re probably right—I keep forgetting that my frame of reference is still TV only having 3 channels.

  3. I read little about the federal minimum wage. That would seem to be a reasonable first 100 days target, and possibly veto resistant

    1. What? You think Donald Trump would skip the veto in order to pay his workers?

      I mean… pay his workers more than the current minimum… nope. I was right the first time.

  4. lol, what universe does Mike Lester live in where the GOP doesn’t riot for not having their way

    1. They all live in an alternate reality, where Jan 6 didn’t happen, public schools are doing gender reassignments on random kids, a single Muslim senator will impose Sharia law on the whole country and at the same time they’re handsome, well-liked, fun to be around, and all their adult children still speak to them.

  5. Mike Lester: It’s still early on the overt & sure to happen on the legislation level…

  6. There’s this new thing called CHATGPT. It’s quite handy:

    Five people died on January 6 or in the immediate aftermath, although the circumstances of their deaths were different.
    Person What happened
    Ashli Babbitt, protester Shot and killed by a Capitol Police lieutenant while attempting to climb through a broken window into the Speaker’s Lobby.
    Brian Sicknick, Capitol Police officer Suffered strokes the following day and died January 7. The medical examiner classified his death as natural causes.
    Kevin Greeson, protester Died after suffering a heart attack outside the Capitol.
    Benjamin Philips, protester Died after suffering a stroke.
    Rosanne Boyland, protester Died after collapsing during the crowd confrontation. Her death was attributed to acute amphetamine intoxication and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

    An important distinction: Four of these people were not killed by gunfire or by a proven assault resulting in death. Babbitt was the only person directly shot and killed during the Capitol breach.

    Several Capitol Police officers subsequently died by suicide. Those deaths are often discussed in connection with January 6, but they should not be incorrectly counted as deaths occurring during the riot.

  7. Sure.

    why would someone feel the need to research the actual number of jan 6 deaths esp. law enforcement?

    Someone might feel the need to research the actual number of deaths on January 6, 2021, particularly law enforcement deaths, for several legitimate reasons.
    The main reason is to separate documented facts from political rhetoric, exaggerations, misunderstandings, and misinformation.
    There are several reasons someone might investigate:
    1. Accuracy and credibility: They want to know exactly how many people died that day and how many deaths were directly attributable to the Capitol riot.
    2. Fairness to law enforcement: They want to establish what actually happened to Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police officers, including injuries, deaths, and suicides in the aftermath.
    3. Political accountability: They want to determine whether politicians, media organizations, and government officials accurately described the casualties.
    4. Historical truth: January 6 was a significant national event. Its casualties should be documented accurately, regardless of political affiliation.
    5. Challenging misleading narratives: They may have heard claims that five police officers were killed during the riot and want to understand whether that statement is literally accurate.
    6. Distinguishing deaths from injuries: Approximately 140 police officers were assaulted or injured. That is a separate statistic from deaths. The Justice Department documented those assaults.

    United States Department of Justice
    +1
    What does the actual record show?
    There is an important distinction:
    Brian Sicknick: Capitol Police officer who died January 7. The medical examiner ruled his death natural, following two strokes, while acknowledging that events on January 6 played a role in his condition.
    Four other officers: Howard Liebengood, Jeffrey Smith, Gunther Hashida and Kyle DeFreytag died by suicide in the days and months afterward.
    Four civilian participants: Died on January 6, including Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer.

    FactCheck.org
    +2
    My point
    Researching the actual numbers does not mean someone is minimizing January 6, defending rioters, or disrespecting police officers.
    It means wanting to distinguish among:
    People killed during the riot.
    People who died afterward.
    Officers whose deaths were connected to their response.
    Officers whose deaths were officially attributed to other causes.
    There is nothing wrong with demanding precision when discussing human lives, particularly when those numbers are being used to make a political argument.
    In fact, the more politically charged an event becomes, the more important factual accuracy becomes.

    1. Cute. Maybe in the interest of accuracy about politically charged events, you could have your Chat provide some concrete examples of the “looting, rioting, burning churches” occurring after Republican victories that your scratchy little elephant man is referring to.

  8. Mr. Normal only SHORTER: “I’m unable to refute your correction of the popular, long held, propaganda that 5-6 pick a number law enforcement officers died as a result of Jan 6 so “provide some concrete examples of the “looting, rioting, burning churches”.

    Bait and switch.

    I seem to be the only one who needs to provide evidence of anything but off the top of my head “hands up don’t shoot”, George Floyd, Luigi Mangione, Tesla attacks, President Trump assassination attempts (plural), Charlie Kirk was racist/deserved it and recent calls to arrest and execute a guy who invented what we all dreamed of as kids -flying cars. You’re obsessed with dreaming of killing your opponents.

    Bowing out but to point to Jan 6 as proof of equivalent acts of violence is not supported by facts. Today our media reports everything skewed or like the ending of WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE: “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.” But you don’t have to repeat it. -Cheers.

      1. Just to add some emphasis, that is “at” and not “with“.

  9. When people minimize Jan. 6th, I wish someone would bring up the Beer Hall Putsch. History rhymes.

  10. I hope you’re wrong about this:

    “ The next two years are likely to be transitional, with Trump hanging onto power despite a congress with majorities in opposition to him.”

    First order of business – IMPEACH AND ARREST

Leave a Reply

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.