Comic Strip of the Day Comic strips Editorial cartooning

CSotD: On Beyond Putin

I could, if I wanted to, do an entire posting of nothing but cartoons showing Vladimir Putin either giving the State of the Union speech or employing a Trump puppet to give the speech.

I don’t want to do that, so I’ll let John Deering’s example represent them all, because he included JD’s “Boycott Vermont” button, and that jolly fiasco was the bright spot of the week hereabouts.

Evan L’Roy/VTDigger

Seems the Green Mountain State has a hillbilly allergy.

I still believe that, if you think of an idea right away, it’s likely a few other cartoonists thought of the same thing, too, but I’m willing to bear in mind that the speech was late at night and went on for an hour and forty minutes, which is a good excuse for doing the first thing that comes to mind, whether you waited for the speech to be over or not.

I hit record and went to bed before it started, but I haven’t seen anything in the news today that makes me want to endure 100 minutes of that bizarre, nasal sing-songy voice Dear Leader adopts when he has to read aloud. It seems he didn’t bring up anything new anyway.

Steve Greenberg had already made the Putin Puppet point anyway, and I appreciate his bipartisan listing, since Vladimir Trumpski seems unwilling to stop complaining about Biden and take a little responsibility for his present policies and for the harmful impact of that fellow who was president just before Biden.

Koterba points out the way Trump’s infatuation with Putin contrasts with Reagan’s tough attitude. It’s up to historians to determine whether Reagan’s Berlin speech hastened the collapse of the Soviet Union, which may have had more to do with their misadventure in Afghanistan and an expensive attempt to match Reagan’s fanciful Star Wars defense shield.

On the other hand, the GOP has apparently forgotten the reverence they had for Reagan and there has even been talk of a name change to “Dear Leader International Airport” as soon as they figure out how to prevent airplanes from banging into each other there.

Dutch, you may remember, broke the air traffic controllers union, but it didn’t occur to him to fire them and let the free market of the skies provide a sort of Darwinian safety program.

It’s that lack of vision that is making him seem so ineffectual by comparison.

Andy Bundy commented on the President’s desire for peace, which consists of letting his pal Vladimir do for Ukraine what another pal is doing to prepare the site for his planned seaside resort.

His attitude in these matters brings back memories of Mad Magazine’s “The Rifle, Man” spoof of a TV show that starred a gun, and the man who loved it.

Trump — who called dead veterans “suckers” and “losers” and didn’t want any disabled vets parading where he could see them — has allowed the muskrats to halt most medical benefits for vets and to cut the veteran’s suicide hotline as wasteful.

Vets are also a large target of the job cuts the muskrats have ordered, but his White House counselor explained that a large number of veterans don’t deserve jobs, so it’s okay.

It makes it kinda hard to pin down Murphy’s specific motivation for this poster mock-up, though perhaps it’s the entire attitude.

Anyhow, it’s one more thing to hammer on between now and the midterms. Surely there are a few vets who voted for Trump but didn’t vote to end burn-pit coverage.

On a practical level, Dear Leader’s power is not based on what he has done so much as what voters think he has done. I was surprised to see Ramirez fall for the ridiculous misjudgment by the muskrats about 150-year-old dead people collecting Social Security.

In case you’ve been ignoring the news, the scandal, such as it is, erupted when Musk’s Children’s Crusade saw that SS logs don’t erase names unless they get a certified death certificate, though they stop writing new checks when the old ones are returned as undeliverable. Or something.

Point is, there’s a difference between having a list of names and writing checks to everyone on that list, but Trump repeated the disproven claim last night.

Why not? We’ve got cabinet members who still believe in all the voter fraud from 2020 that was exhaustively and expensively investigated without results.

So Ramirez added that clearly false conspiracy theory to the Social Security nonsense.

It makes you wonder if anybody wants to fight this out on facts, or if they’re afraid of losing a reality-based battle?

It will be interesting to see if Dear Leader can skate around the impact of the trade war his belief in tariffs is setting off. The impact on grocery prices should be fairly immediate, given how much of our fruits and vegetables come from Mexico and how much wheat and other grains come from Canada.

It may take longer for people to feel the effect on housing prices caused by tariffs on Canadian lumber, and on cars, given the number of times various parts cross both borders even if the final product is assembled here.

But the real question is how long Dear Leader can blame everything on Biden, and what other scapegoats he can find.

The other day, he suggested that farmers could offset the loss of Chinese markets for soy beans by selling them to Americans instead, which indicates that he has no idea how much soy we export or what the American diet consists of.

“Let them eat tofu” is not sound economic advice, particularly coming from someone whose diet seems to consist entirely of Diet Coke and Quarter Pounders.

Tony Carrillo charges people with complaining instead of “doing something,” but complaining is “doing something:” It’s raising consciousness and letting people know it’s not hopeless, despite the flood of hateful disinformation.

Some may be motivated to take action, and we do need people to register voters and support candidates.

But even if all they do is show up on election day, that’s “doing something.”

There’s a lot to be said for raising consciousness when ignorance, fear and hatred are the enemies.

Previous Post
Cartoonists in the News
Next Post
Darrin Bell Returns to Substack

Comments 14

  1. Is the man in F Minus a Democratic politician I should recognize?

    And if you complain on Face&#@k or Twitter, know that no one will see it, certainly not the people who need to.

    But making phone calls, writing letters, even emails is, beyond boycotts, about all us little people can do. I’ve found it surprisingly hard, and haven’t done nearly enough, but I’m working on it.

    1. I posted a wisecrack on Threads the other day that got 38,800 views and a thousand likes, plus a number of forwards. You never know, but Gretzky’s Law comes into it somewhere.

  2. Clearly DOGE has somehow tuned into a Facebook account rather that the Social Security rolls. At last count, I’ve gor 57 Facebook Friends on my list who died up to 25 years ago, with no way to “retire,” remove or delete them. It’s okay, I enjoy seeing their faces, but I’ve removed them from my Christmas card list because that’s just wasting postage and cards.

  3. The US has now become the first post soviet dictatorship in a state that was never behind the Iron Curtain. Have you seen the golden statues in Trump’s Gaza real estate promo video? Compare that with Turkmenistan. Next thing he is stealing the gold from Forth Knox, replacing it with some worthless memecoin. Boom goes the Lincoln memorial, and in its place a golden monument of Trump heroically riding a golf cart into battle (or more likely fleeing from one).

  4. I read last night that the Ontario premier is preparing to cut electricity exports to the US. However, that will primarily affect Blue states, so who cares?

  5. I’m doubtful about the cutoff of Ontario power exports to the US, but if it comes to pass its impacts will depend on how the grid is designed, both in the US and Ontario. It may be that Ohio is a major beneficiary of Ontario power.

    And, if privately owned utilities are involved, how corporate profit is impacted could play a role. I also fear that Ontario hydropower is replacing fossil fuel generation that could be brought back on line in an “emergency.”

  6. After doing a little research, it seems that there is an active flow of power from Ontario to Michigan, with Michigan being a net importer. Do we think of Michigan as a blue state anymore?

    1. Michigan is a swing state. As Lost says below, its key politicians are Democratic; however, it voted red in November, primarily due to Gaza. Michigan has a large percentage of Arab/Middle-East Americans in its voting population, and they were none too happy with Biden’s support of Netanyahu’s shelling of Gaza. Their desire to punish Biden/Harris was enough to tilt Michigan to the Trump camp, ironically for reasons not involving Trump.

  7. when you wrote “SS logs” you meant “social security logs” didn’t you?

  8. Michigan has a Democratic Governor, and two Democratic Senators. That’s probably Blue enough.

  9. “It may take longer for people to feel the effect on housing prices caused by tariffs on Canadian lumber…”

    I have a Gen Z kid working for me lately (I’m an elder millennial). We often discuss generational differences, and one that has become clear is that to his mind and those of his peers, owning a home is a) life goal number one, and b) what defines “wealthy”. For my parents’ generation, NOT owning a home was a sign that you screwed up somewhere along the line (his take; I haven’t explored the idea much, but it seems to be about right overall… maybe… anyway…). For my generation, it’s a definite challenge, but not entirely impossible (this assumes you got your act together before everything really went to shit during the pandemic). For his, it’s framed as aspirational, and borderline unattainable.

    As a result, I’ve been thinking about the housing market with all of this. With the largest single employer in the country (world?) laying off a significant percentage of its workforce comprised of formerly stable and well paying jobs, and all those workers chasing the same much smaller pool of jobs simultaneously, it may be that there are a lot of people about to become insolvent on their mortgages. The housing market may soon become considerably more liquid. In doing so, there will be a supply side drop in prices (which will hurt those people even more). Of course, based on recent economic statistics, assuming there’s a trend and not a blip, interest rates will rise again, and make things worse still.

    Additionally, part of the problem with building new homes to increase the supply has been the extreme rise in cost of entry to the market post-great recession. It’s impossible for first time home buyers (without a trust fund) to build a new home, and takes many years of equity and expensive and difficult to source financial tools for anyone else to even come close. Only top earners can afford to do so. The price of building materials will rise, but the consumer side of the market (again, mostly limited to top earners) is much less sensitive to cost than what would otherwise be the norm.

    What seems more likely to be affected is those back at the bottom of the market again attempting to keep their existing homes standing. I’m currently engaged in some pretty major home repair, so this take could suffer from a bit of myopia.

    1. I think a 25% jump in material costs will have an impact, but buying homes, like buying cars, is a more thought-out and delayable process than buying food. Hence my sense that food prices will matter immediately and those larger items will hit later. And, BTW, if Dear Leader’s deportation of migrants is successful, their replacements on construction crews will likely expect greater pay.

    2. I don’t know the percentage, but a lot of new housing is built by speculators to sell. If it gets to the point that costs are such that they don’t see any profit in it, new housing construction will slow drastically. I fear for the world that my grandchildren are growing in to.

Leave a Reply

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.