Editorial cartooning

The Fading Art of Editorial Cartooning

In the summer of 2018, I drew a political cartoon for the local newspaper of a small Adirondack lake community in upstate New York.

Hilarious, right? Well, not everyone thought so.

After the cartoon ran, the editor informed me that several people had canceled their subscriptions, calling the cartoon mean-spirited and partisan. He said the newspaper would need to be more cautious about publishing political cartoons in the future as the paper was not in a position to lose subscribers.

The conversation left me baffled. I pointed out that the paper regularly published editorials critical of President Donald Trump and other local Republicans. Why should a cartoon be any different?

The editor explained: Most people don’t read.

Cartoonist Heywood Reynolds mourns the loss of an art form for The Times Union.

Still, artists and cartoonists are thriving on social media. By “thriving,” I mean their work is widely shared — but almost no one is paying them.

Previous Post
CSotD: Sunday Morning Potpourri
Next Post
CSotD: Monday Merriment (Closet Cleanout)

Comments 4

  1. You took aim at voters, not the politicians. What does your cartoon do? It trashes them as lunatics. Is that a political cartoon or self indulgent slop?

    1. How did it take aim at voters. I interpreted it as taking aim at the names on the flags. But if you want to interpret it differently, you are welcome to. That’s the beauty of political cartoons. They are open to interpretation. Until newspapers cancel them out of fear. Then there is nothing to interpret.

  2. Name calling is cheap. You wouldn’t even encourage your own kids to use that tactic in their own lives. Ohh but if you don’t say something how will they know they suck?? Think of something better, that’s how.

Leave a Reply

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.