Mr. Boffo often uses the term “unclear on the concept” in portraying a character who genuinely just doesn’t get it.
Joe Martin should have used it today, because the term “mailman” disappeared a couple of decades ago, and the majority of actors under 40 use the term “actor” regardless of sex, just as nobody says “poetess” anymore either.
And let me anticipate a comment or two by acknowledging that some people still say “mailman” just as some people still say “golly” even when they aren’t intentionally imitating Gomer Pyle, and, yes, the Academy still awards an “Actress of the Year” Oscar, though at least they don’t call it an Oscaress.
But you’re no longer a hipster just for saying “actor” or “letter carrier” for everyone in those job categories. You’re just normal.
“Actress” and “mailman” are strictly from Squaresville, Daddio.
The relevance at this point being that, as Ed Wexler suggests, the word “creep” is still in use to describe men who boast about grabbing women’s private parts and think they’re popular with the ladies though women who know them cannot abide their creepy behavior.
So when the garbage collector announced that he was going to protect women whether they liked it or not, he got a collective groan from a lot of women and a snicker from the sorts of men who respect women.
I’m not sure how many creeps realize that their boastful “locker room talk” gets eyerolls from men over 14, or at least from men over 14 who behave like men over 14.
Steve Brodner points out something that has recently surfaced, which is that a lot of Gen Z women had never heard the Access Hollywood tape that caused a stir back in 2016, when they were too young to vote and weren’t particularly paying attention.
Well, they’ve heard it now and they’ve been passing it around on TikTok and it’s getting a more dramatic response from them than it did from their elders, since they’ve grown to adulthood in a world in which being a creep is not something to be debated and discussed.
Their mothers and older sisters marched in pussy hats to protest the creep in the White House, but the Gen Z’s may just make sure he doesn’t get there in the first place.
And perhaps even moreso if their elders explain to them who this fellow Jeffery Epstein was, since tapes have just emerged in which he talks about his close relationship with Donald Trump, which I think we older folks kind of knew about but couldn’t quite prove and took for granted anyway.
And, yes, there’s more than one source on the story:
Epstein also shared photos from the “late 90s” of Trump surrounded by “topless young women” at Epstein’s home in Palm Beach, Florida, where the disgraced financier victimized dozens of underage girls alongside his friend Ghislaine Maxwell.
Here’s a term you don’t hear very often anymore:
“Yikes.”
Point being not that he’s a creep, which remains something of a personal issue, but that, as Rob Rogers points out, he represents a conservative trend towards limiting women’s choices and, specifically, attempting to control their reproductive rights.
Which is also creepy but in a more universal rather than personal way. It’s not as if most women were going to run into him in the dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman’s, or have him come charging into another dressing room when they’re among a group of half-naked pageant contestants. Or party with him at Jeffrey Epstein’s. Or whatever.
But his leadership bids fair to interfere with their personal life even if he’s never within a thousand miles of them himself. Sort of a case of assault by proxy.
It has not gone unnoticed by his opponent, whose ad on the topic has Trump’s loyal army of incels and hypocrites up in arms, poor babies:
Pat Bagley isn’t laughing it off, suggesting that some women may be intimidated by their husbands into voting the way he wants.
While Steve Kelley (Creators) joins critics like Jesse Watters and Newt Gingrich in denouncing the idea as a violation of trust, though both Watters and Gingrich had affairs with other women while they were married, making “trust” apparently something of a one-way street.
The concept of trusting your mate to make her own choices being the point of the Julia Roberts ad but not the point of the uproar it has caused.
Thus Mike Luckovich suggests that the voting booth can be a transformative changing room into which no creeps will barge.
Ain’t they got no Googles where you live?
Lisa Benson (Counterpoint) celebrated Halloween by digging up a long-dead zombie accusation, that Kamala Harris refuses to talk to the press.
This is one of those things like “Al Gore lies” and “John Kerry didn’t earn his medals” that became an constant meme in the election without any factual basis except that, given the suddenness of her vault into the presidential role, Harris didn’t immediately begin doing in-depth interviews and, once her campaign got under way, she failed to butter up the usual Beltway media.
But once launched, she’s been a tireless campaigner, the laugh being that the opposition accuses her both of never taking questions from the press and of talking too much in her answers.
In any case, here’s her schedule for today. See if you can find any places where she gives the press access:
The press, it turns out, will have coverage at all of them and individual access at two of the nine events, and if you’d like to trace back further, try this account at Xitter.
Point being that it took about 20 seconds to pull that up.
But you had to want to know the facts and you had to bother looking.
And Mike Beckom (Counterpoint) also somehow forgot to use Google before drawing his cartoon, or possibly he didn’t try.
Again, it simply involves wanting to know the answer and bothering to look it up.
Let me Google that for you:
Huh. Turns out there have, indeed, been endorsements for Harris. Quite a few, as it happens.
Here’s a substantial list at Wikipedia.
There are more, but the trend is obvious.
Here’s another trend: Tuesday is coming.
It ain’t “encel”, it’s incel for involuntary celibate. Also known as “ignorant creep with no social skills.”
I thought it was a guy who keeps a spreadsheet of all the women who’ve shot him down. (Fixed, thx)
You know, that’s a short story prompt right there, dontcha?
…and poor hygiene
Funny, since the “Hollywood Access” tape broke in 2016, I’ve heard the last minute of it (with the “pussy” censored and uncensored”) at least 100 times over the intervening years, including the E. Jean Carroll trial. Last night on MSNBC, Chris Hayes, referencing the TikTok story, played the entire 3-4 minute version uncensored, including the portion where Trump says, “I tried to f— her. She was married.” and includes about eight men departing the bus about a minute afterwards (none looking terribly entertained) leaving Trump and the ultra-juvenile Billy Bush chortling over Bush’s rapey bragging. It’s the first time I’ve ever seen it all, despite having watched cable news channels for two-six hours a day since my September 2020 stroke –and no WONDER the TikTok viewers have been so appalled–it’s at least twice as disgusting as it was the first 100 times. I think they should have been pushing the whole thing as a new story for the past month–I doubt things would be nearly as close as they allegedly are if they had.
That was “Access Hollywood,” off course.
Everywhere you look, news outlets are quoting/graphing POLLS to create headlines. And every last one of them ignores that the questions in those polls, no matter who is asking, are aligned to return a desired result. Polls are therefore USELESS in gauging what they claim to provide. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=yes+minister+polls
Read today’s New York Times endorsement of Kamala Harris and its explicit descriptions of Trump.
(I wonder if Sulzberger and his minions knew it was being published. The old “Friday night news dump” is a journalism tradition)
I have to admit the “nobody has to know who you voted for” ads don’t really sit well with me, not so much because of the implied deception but because it promotes a sort of cowardice. i.e. “just keep your mouth shut and everything will be okay”
I’m sorry, but if you’re married to someone who’s all “You WILL vote for Trump, dammit!” maybe it’s time to contact a divorce lawyer
Wow. If only it were so “easy”.
Turns out there are plenty of people out there in abusive relationships with no easy lifeline, let alone the money to afford a divorce lawyer (and the support network to continue once divorced). Count yourself lucky you’ve never been that low.
Obviously you’ve never been around a woman with a couple of black eyes for the crime of disagreeing with her husband. On a matter way less important than who to vote for.
And no, you don’t necessarily just pick up and walk. Women who can do that don’t get themselves in these kinds of situations in the first place.
Trump will protect women the way the Taliban educate them.
Wow. Today’s Mr. Boffo rubbed me the wrong way too. I came here to see what you had to say about the strip in general and was surprised to see that today’s column was about it and echoed my thoughts pretty precisely.
Brilliant video choice, BTW.