CSotD: Darkness at News

There have been a number of cartoons responding to Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos having spiked an endorsement for Kamala Harris, many of them playing on the Post’s motto “Democracy Dies in the Dark.”

Ann Telnaes gets the top spot in part because she works there and her cartoon joins with 16 Washington Post columnists who signed an outraged statement protesting the move, which is reason enough, but also because while she is perennially one of the most inventive political cartoonists, she knows when it’s time to be plainspoken.

And her fans recognize her outrage, as the comments on her page indicate.

The fact that the Post has published protests over the topic — from both staff and readers — is encouraging, because it indicates a chasm between the people who make the paper and the man who owns it, and that there is a difference between doing what you’ve been ordered to do and behaving like a lickspittle.

Cartoonists at other outlets, of course, are speaking up as well:

RJ Matson depicts a sunset of honesty and courage, and a willingness to go dark rather than take risks to defend democracy.

Clay Bennett (CTFP) draws darkness and a candle not extinguished but never even lighted. The Washington Post is a powerful tool, but not if its owner refuses to use it.

Both Washpo and the LA Times have seen resignations as their billionaire bosses order them not to endorse Kamala Harris, and it’s important that both papers intended a Harris endorsement.

This sudden appetite for “neutrality” is a puppet show, and it’s hard to believe either oligarch would have stepped in to kill a Trump endorsement.

Dave Whamond goes straight to the explanation, which is not some grand desire to be neutral but rather a cowardly desire to stay out of trouble, bearing in mind that this isn’t an election about who will be the better president but rather whether we will continue as a constitutional democracy.

As Patrick Chappatte notes, Trump has plainly stated the fact that he is willing to cancel parts of the Constitution he doesn’t like, that he wants to investigate and prosecute those who disagree with him, including both media figures and elected officials, and that once he’s in office, we won’t need further elections.

That’s not a guess or an interpretation: He said it, and now the head of the Freedom Caucus has seriously proposed that North Carolina’s legislature vote to give its 16 Electoral College votes to Trump before the election.

We’ve reached a point where Australian cartoonist Glen LeLievre doesn’t need to do anything more to get his point across than draw Hitler with tiny hands and a familiar shadow.

Remember when we thought this meme was funny? Who’s laughing now? And don’t say Mike Pence because he is not only off the ticket but has declined to endorse his former runningmate.

The term being used is “anticipatory obedience,” which is to say that the owners of the LA Times and Washington Post are withholding endorsements of Harris because they’re afraid of what will happen to them if they infuriate Donald Trump and he wins.

David Frum is one of a number of conservatives who aren’t buying arguments about neutrality, and his condemnation of their cowardice contains an important subtext: Several observers have pointed out that endorsements have a very limited impact and aren’t apt to change many votes.

But killing an endorsement for Harris may send a stronger message than running it would have.

If you want to live in a world in which the president dictates — that’s the correct verb — what appears in your newspaper and on your TV, you can either vote for Donald Trump or just stay home and let him win by default.

We’re told the race is tied, and that might be the best way to motivate people to vote, but RJ Matson questions the validity of polls, given the number of people who don’t answer phone calls from unfamiliar numbers.

There are other issues with polling, including a rash of conservative push-polls in which the questions lead people to the pollster’s desired responses, but there is also the question of whether those who declare themselves undecided truly are wondering who to vote for or are not likely voters at all and claim to be undecided so they will sound engaged and intelligent.

I was looking for something else yesterday and stumbled across this Rex Babin cartoon from 2000. We’ve always had undecided voters and I think Babin was right: There’s little point in counting them because the bulk of them will never come to a decision in time.

It certainly doesn’t help the process when BC (Creators) fuels the false notion that nobody has faith in the system. Quislings and paranoid mooncalves don’t; the rest of us do.

Undermining the system is not confined to the funny pages or shock jock podcasts. Last Friday, NPR had a story on All Things Considered in which they discussed what a dozen people who previously didn’t like either candidate were thinking now.

Another bogus horserace report in which a statistically insignificant number of people are interviewed as if they represented some major demographic group.

Mara Laisson admitted the process was “anecdata,” but her recognition that the exercise is largely meaningless didn’t stop them from airing the results.

I finally turned off the radio when one of the Twelve Chosen Ones said

From what I’ve seen and read, one of the big problems that the country has with her is that, other than what’s readily available in her book, we don’t know a whole lot about her.

Yes, indeed, that’s what he’s seen and read because that’s what reporters and columnists and commentators keep saying and writing, just as they keep saying the economy is bad despite all the evidence that, in fact, it’s not just rebounding but doing quite well.

Though JD Vance said on CNBC that if immigration was the path to prosperity, then “America would be the most prosperous country in the world.”

Which it is, but we mustn’t tell the voters.

Meanwhile, today’s Sufi Comics might have been written with Jeff Bezos and Patrick Soon-Shiong in mind:

“He has succeeded who purifies it (the soul), and
he has failed who instills it with corruption.”
Quran (91:9-10)

13 thoughts on “CSotD: Darkness at News

  1. There’s probably no way to hit Patrick Soon-Shiong’s pocketbook, but wouldn’t boycotting amazon.com be more appropriate than canceling one’s WaPo subscription?

    1. The Post has a wide subscription base, but it’s smaller than Amazon Prime’s. A few thousand cancellations will be a lot more noticeable for the Post than it will be for Amazon Prime.

      The post has 135,980 print subscribers and 2.5 million digital subscribers. There are 200,000,000 Amazon Prime subscribers.

    2. Major newspapers receive far more income from advertising than from subscriptions. Losing 1000 subscribers would barely make a ripple in their revenue stream. Losing 1000 advertisers could cripple, if not kill, the paper, depending on the size of the ad buys.

      A better approach might be to boycott the advertisers (especially the small businesses), AND contact those advertisers IN WRITING, letting them know you are boycotting them because of the paper’s actions or lack thereof. Also, cancel the subscription and tell the paper why in writing for good measure.

      Hundreds of people canceling Prime memberships would have little effect on the business. People do that all the time. However, hundreds of people no longer using Amazon, and telling them why IN WRITING, would have a better effect.

      I know from experience on both the consumer and the business side that writing, especially hard-copy mail, gives the message far more impact. Also, it bypasses the flappers on the phone who simply tick a box on their daily contact sheets.

      IMHO and YMMV

  2. I went to cancel my WaPo digital subscription, which just renewed last month for $120 for the year. They offer NO refund for cancelled subscriptions, but they offered me a $60 rebate if I stayed. I took the rebate because, hey, if I’m paid up through September 2025 no matter what, I might as well get some of my money back. If I no longer visit their content, stop giving them any clicks, will they notice? I will post the rebate info in the comments of the things I (used to) follow — if enough of us take them up on the rebate, maybe that will get their attention.
    Scroom (tip of the hat to John D. MacDonald.

    1. How did you get a rebate? I just got an offer of a $60 rate on my subscription renewal next year. Did you use the online form?

  3. I wonder what the motivation of Bezos here is. I don’t buy the “fear of Trump” scene, but I do know he has reacted poorly to criticisms in the press suggesting that he has a fragile ego, and I know that Lina Khan, now chairman of the FTC, wrote an important paper titled “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” with suggestions on how antitrust legislation might need to be modified.

    1. Dear Sue,
      Bezos, like Musk, Zuckerburg, Trump, Kim Jong, Putin, and many “world leaders” and CEO’s of Corporations is part of a group, statistically. These people display the characteristics described in the Disagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, a textbook used by every school, and university of Psychiatric training, and a copy of which is found in every psychiatrist’s office.

      It is accessible online and is a guideline for all mental health disorders, conditions, and evaluation terms.

      Bezos, like the others mentioned above, is a psychopath with malignant narcissistic personality disorder. If you look it up, it will illustrate what to look for in a person to confirm a diagnosis.

      1. Agreed. And if you check out the Hare list for psychopathy, which is a convenient list of psychopathic traits, you’d find a number of them meet those criteria, as does Trump. There is some thought that these characteristics are present in about 10% of top management personnel. Obviously, there is some selective advantage for such people, but I wonder how much might be genetic and how much might be variables in development, the old nature vs. nurture question.

    2. WaPo is quite possibly losing money, but Bezos has Amazon and AWS (Amazon Web Services) to generate cashflow. He also has Blue Origin, which may never be a viable business but for sure it would fail if gov’t wanted to strangle it in its very expensive crib. So Bezos is exposed to the wrath of a vengeful POTUS, if Coppertone Caligula retakes the White House. If Harris wins, there will be no real retaliation. And this calculus does not at all depend on Hair Furor retaliating only against Bezos’s business interests, rather than testing his SCOTUS-blessed impunity to enact more personally destructive forms of revenge.

  4. Here’s some others that Mike didn’t have:
    Washington Post’s Non-Endorsement
    In a disingenuous editorial
    Liza Donnelly
    Oct 26, 2024
    https://lizadonnelly.substack.com/p/newspapers-are-crumbling

    Bok Bok Bezos
    The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times aren’t endorsing in this election
    Clay Jones
    Oct 26, 2024
    https://claytoonz.substack.com/p/bok-bok-bezos

    A spineless Press caves
    The Post, the LA Times and The AZ Daliy Star
    David W Fitzsimmons
    Oct 26, 2024
    https://davidwfitzsimmons.substack.com/p/a-spineless-press-caves

Comments are closed.

Top