CSotD: Comics I Don’t Understand

I borrowed today’s headline from an old website run by the late Bill Bickel in which he used to mock comic strips for not coming up to his standards. It was one of a couple of similar sites that motivated me to launch Comic Strip of the Day in 2010, because I thought it better to praise the people doing it right than to pour scorn on the hacks.

However, I happen to have come across a number of puzzling things today, and we’ll start with this piece by Steve Brodner, who very much does do things right.

In this case, he’s commenting on a bizarre situation in which CNN assembled a panel of undecided voters, one of whom turned out to be a dedicated Trump supporter.

Bonehead mistakes happen. Until I got into the details — and that linked article is full of them — it reminded me of a situation several decades ago in which a Texas paper assigned a rookie reporter to interview people about Obama’s Affordable Care Act. She was bushwhacked by anti-Obamacare activists who volunteered as regular folks to announce how much they hated the proposal.

This is different. According to the fake “Undecided Voter,” he told the CNN producer that he was a Trump supporter, and, even if he didn’t, a third-grader could have done a quick online search and discovered it anyway.

I wasn’t able to track down Brodner’s claim that John Malone has ordered changes, but I’m more disturbed by the lack of mainstream coverage of this story.

CNN didn’t just make a mistake. They perpetrated an easily avoidable fraud.

But it seems the coverage is limited to a handful of muckrakers, and none of the major outlets are picking it up.

I don’t get it.

On a related note — that is, bad decisions by major outlets that major outlets aren’t discussing — Tom Tomorrow has some fun with a growing discontent over Fact Checkers.

IMHO, he spends too many panels on limp justifications that seem to justify Trump, but I can’t argue with the specifics because — granted with comic exaggeration — they mirror actual explanations I’ve seen.

And it might not matter if Trump got too cozy with Kim Jong Un, but when he recommended injecting disinfectants to fight covid, people did, with dangerous results.

It does, of course, matter whether Trump gets cozy with murderous dictators, but the other half of this problem is that in order to appear “fair,” fact checkers then turn around and nit-pick Democratic statements to suggest a level of falsity equal to Trump’s.

It’s the “they all do it” game, which is only valid when you prove it, not when you jam it into place like Cinderella’s stepsisters cutting off their toes in an attempt to fit into the glass slipper.

Drew Sheneman, bless his heart, points out the falsity and hypocrisy of MAGAts who jumped to mock Gus Walz and then withdrew their hateful remarks with this bogus explanation.

What I don’t understand this time around is why you would pour hatred on a kid in the first place. It’s reminiscent of 1995, when blowhard bully Rush Limbaugh called 12-year-old Chelsea Clinton a dog.

Chelsea, you will note, has since outgrown clumsy adolescence and become a stylish, attractive woman, but, 30 years later, pigs are still pigs and they still wallow in their own filth.

I don’t get why, but Sheneman offers an insight, if not an answer.

What I don’t get in this Matt Davies cartoon is his point.

I’m seeing a lot of cartoons about how traumatized kids will be if they can’t wile away the hours in history and math classes texting their friends under the desk, and, as I’ve written before, I’ve got more faith in their resilience than that. They’ll either get over it or find ways past it, but they’ll all survive somehow.

Davies, I hope, is simply illustrating the way some parents are responding to an educational emergency of their own making. In an actual emergency, you call the office, just as parents did for decades before cell phones existed.

The issue — to the extent there is one — is what exactly constitutes an emergency these days? Our ability to contact each other any time any place has spawned a generation of helicopter parents for whom any whim must be immediately addressed.

It ain’t about the kids, and, to that extent, Davies has it right. As either Socrates or possibly Ben Franklin said, “The kids are alright.” (Go ahead and fact-check that.)

Juxtaposition of the Day

Pat Bagley

Ratt

Bagley notes an effort in Utah to suppress citizen initiatives, but it’s not solely a regional issue. Arkansas successfully blocked an effort to get a pro-choice measure on the ballot in November, using a technicality to frustrate 100,000 petitioners.

For that matter, about the time I left Colorado 35 years ago, politicians were trying to stop citizens from being able to force votes on things that mattered to them.

But if you don’t understand how they reason, Ratt reminds us of the old dodge used by authoritarians, a debating club point about how we aren’t actually a democracy but rather a republic. Like most debating club arguments, it does very well within a sealed academic bell jar but expires immediately when exposed to light and oxygen.

No, we’re not a direct democracy. We don’t all go down to Washington and stand around outside the Capitol raising our hands to vote on every measure that comes up.

But the idea that representational democracy means we elect people who don’t listen to us is so fundamentally foolish that it cannot be dismissed as an error. It is a deliberate attempt to place power in the hands of an authoritarian elite.

And it appears to be working. I don’t get it.

I realize a lot of people don’t read newspapers anymore, but what in the wide wide world of sports leads Dana Summers (Tribune) to think losing RFK Jr’s endorsement is a blow to the Harris/Walz campaign?

No, they didn’t respond when he solicited a job in exchange for aligning his wackadoodle campaign with their sensible one. What a lost opportunity!

Perhaps they should correct this error by opening negotiations with Tarquin Fin-Tim-Lin-Bin-Whin-Bim-Lin-Bus-Stop-F’Tang-F’Tang-Olé-Biscuitbarrel.

Assuming Tarquin hasn’t already endorsed Trump.

h/t Graeme Keyes

11 thoughts on “CSotD: Comics I Don’t Understand

  1. Does Bobby Jr actually think that any “promises” Trump made to him for his endorsement would ever come to fruition? What a maroon.

  2. The “We’re a republic, not a democracy” cliche was popularized by the Birchers and other segregationists in the 1950s. Whenever you hear it now you can bet it’s being used by someone trying to justify denying another American their rights.

    BTW, in Federalist Paper #10, James Madison discusses this issue. He argues that a republic was better suited for a large country, dispersed over a large area, with varied interests in part because it would be less vulnerable to falling under the influence of a demagogue. Ironically, the party that keeps parroting the ‘We’re a republic, not a democracy” line is the one run by a demagogue.

    https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed10.asp

  3. Bill Bickel’s family allowed Comics I Don’t Understand to continue, now moderated by fans, and it’s still quite active. It has moved, though, and is now at https://cidu.info/. I would describe it as a very pro-comics site. Unlike CSotD, though, it’s a politics-free zone.

    1. Personally, I’m casting my vote for Raymond Luxury-Yacht (pronounced “Throat-Warbler Mangrove”)

      GIVE ME MY NOSE BACK!

    2. Yeah, CIDU was about, well, comics he didn’t understand. He wasn’t mocking them. Your might be thinking of the Comics Curmudgeon.

      1. CIDU was the least bothersome. I just wanted to use the headline. My main objection to his work was that he dragged out the same strips over and over and I felt he had made his point about Mary Worth or whatever. The most obnoxious of these tear-down pieces was a column out of Baltimore that was just prep-school wiseassery and that’s the one I genuinely found distasteful.

        I realize that there are several cartoonists I return to often, either to tear up or to praise, but the advantage of doing a lot of political commentary is that I’m more apt to criticize someone for just not doing their homework or for mindlessly illustrating someone else’s talking points.

        And I hope it’s balanced overall by the fact that I praise people for doing excellent work. That’s what a good critic should do. If you don’t also point out what you think is good, there’s little value in pointing out what you think is bad.

      2. Hey Mike: Your mention of “Mary Worth” is definitive evidence that the site you were remembering was Josh’s Curmudgeon, and not Bill’s CIDU. In all the years I have been reading CIDU, I cannot recall a single appearance of “Mary Worth”; it was the prevalence of that strip at the Curmudgeon that led me to remove the site from my reading list. Some people (like Josh) love poking holes in soap operas, others (like me) avoid them like the plague.

  4. “Fact Checking” has definitely become another tool for media outlets to appear “fair” when the facts don’t actually line up with the message they’re trying to push. i.e. if Trump lied 150 times during a speech, then surely Harris must have done so as well, right? Criminy.

    I myself have encountered a few “AKTCHUALLY Trump didn’t tell people to inject bleach, but disinfectant. Totally not the same!” arguments.

    The whole “kids will go nuts if they don’t have their smartphones in school” thing is definitely BS being pushed by helicopter parents who obsessively need to contact their kid for every little thing.
    I mean, I was (and am) addicted to video games, yet I managed to get through those 8 hours a day without a controller in my hand just fine.

    That Summers comic is truly something else. Yes, I can’t *possibly* imagine why the Democrats wouldn’t lose sleep over not getting RFK Jr’s support.
    I will say that RFK Jr backing Trump has done nothing to dispel the “weird” accusations…

  5. Rushbo and his ilk didn’t think Amy Carter was all that attractive iteher. But hey, we’ve all reed what Donald says about how attractive his daughter is.

  6. The “both sides do it/are crooks” argument is what my friend said when I mentioned that Trump refused to pay my cousin-in-law for a legit invoice in the early 90s for work done on Trump tower. Trump once again stole money from the “little guy” he supposedly champions.

    But yeah, they’re all the same, right?

Comments are closed.

Top