CSotD: Other Voices
Skip to comments
Given the sudden disruption of the 2024 Presidential Election, I thought it only fair to present takes in opposition to my normally progressive point-of-view.
Christian Adams gets to lead off because several overseas views have been unclear, perhaps because they’re not getting a full spectrum of the chatter here.
It’s true that Harris represents a reboot and fresh start, but to suggest that Biden is the Forgotten Man not only flies in the face of what is being said about his decision to step aside — the tributes have been many, including from Harris herself — but also ignores her campaign’s foundation on the success of the Biden/Harris Administration.
It’s less a voice of opposition than one of not getting it. As noted yesterday, there’s a lot of foreign commentary at Cartoon Movement calling the move a Biden failure rather than a recasting of the race.
Bob Gorrell (Creators) echoes that viewpoint on this side of the Atlantic, and it’s a fair assessment from a GOP perspective. Obviously, the Democrats didn’t plan to recast the ticket in the middle of the race and, just as obviously, there was a great deal of intra-party pressure on Biden to step down.
Still, while to insist that the party and its followers have been revitalized is a subjective observation, the fact that Harris’s apparent nomination has brought in, as I write this at 5 a.m., more than $81 million in fresh donations is an objective indicator of how the “failure” is playing out.
Biden-as-failure will play well with the party faithful — and keeping them aboard matters — but it’s unlikely to sway the undecided, who can plainly see the enthusiasm coming from the Democratic side.
Chip Bok (Creators) echoes the kick in the ass concept, but his intentions are unclear.
Had he cited the Democrats’ rejection of Bernie Sanders in favor of Hilary Clinton in 2016, he might be suggesting that Bernie could have won and Hilary didn’t and that dumping Biden now is another fatal error.
But in 2020 the Democratic choice of candidates led to victory, despite all the “Stop the Steal” claims. I very much doubt Bok is predicting that the ticket change will lead the Democrats to the White House in November.
Then again, I can’t explain what he does mean.
I was surprised to see Bill Bramhall, a progressive voice, express doubts about Harris’s capability, though her candidacy disintegrated in the 2020 campaign, and if he’s pointing out the four short months she has to get things lined up before November, fair enough.
It’s also fair to pour a little cold water on all the excitement and point out that Trump remains a formidable opponent. King Kong swatted down a lot of biplanes before succumbing himself.
Still, I can’t help remembering how it all ended:
Police Lieutenant: Well, Denham, the airplanes got him.
Carl Denham: Oh no, it wasn’t the airplanes. It was beauty killed the beast.
Beauty, charisma, whatever.
Mike Lester (AMS) updates the aeronautical technology and suggests that the Democrats are putting Harris in a Japanese Zero, presumably to carry out “a day of infamy,” and he’s not wrong to point out the shock this shift has caused, though calling campaigning against Donald Trump a dastardly attack on America seems more a partisan rallying cry for the MAGA crowd than a likely appeal to the undecided.
Yamamoto’s famous quote, “I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve,” does not appear to have ever been said by him.
On the other hand, while the US didn’t turn things around in four months, they didn’t take a whole lot longer. As that Wikipedia article says
It would be wise for both sides to put the champagne and confetti aside until November 6.
Juxtaposition of the Day
Varvel and Stantis offer one of the more respectable reactions, that Biden has handed off an incurable disaster.
You could argue that polls indicated a tie, within the margin of error, and so the Biden/Harris campaign wasn’t in complete disarray. However, things were obviously going badly, and it’s reasonable to raise doubts that Harris can reverse things in four months.
Given that undecided voters often want to align with the winning side, claiming that the Democrats haven’t got a chance is a good attack that might bring some swing voters over to the GOP.
On the other hand, Harris has four weeks to establish her message before the DNC Convention in August, and not only is there nearly always a bump in approval following a convention, but the timing of Biden’s withdrawal has deflected attention from the RNC’s recent gathering.
Tom Stiglich (Creators) echoes Mike Johnson’s ridiculous talking point, that delegates are locked in and cannot legally change their choice when the convention meets. Aside from polls showing overwhelming support among Democrats for the change, delegates are not required — by party rules or, certainly, by law — to vote for the candidate they initially supported.
There doesn’t seem to be any upside in making this absurd claim, and I expect it to disappear shortly. But I’ve been wrong before.
Juxtaposition of the Day #2
Summers and Payne descend to personal insults, and it’s not clear if these cartoons — though dated for Monday — were done in response to Sunday’s events or were about the mounting pressure.
Neither, however, references Kamala Harris, and if personal insults are cheapshots to amuse the cult, I suspect we haven’t seen anything yet.
Lisa Benson (Counterpoint) references Harris with a number of accusations, starting with the GOP’s favored-but-false inflation claims and what will be a major attack point on Harris, that she was tasked with addressing the border crisis. Crossings are down and the GOP tanked border legislation in order to maintain it as a Trump campaign issue, but refuting it won’t be easy, particularly with reports of a new caravan being promoted as happening in fear of a Trump victory.
Benson also attacks the concepts of DEI (hiring women and minorities), ESG (investing in responsible corporations) and being woke, which means caring about the less fortunate.
Mike Beckom (Counterpoint) is less specific about what is wrong with Kamala Harris, except that it’s making Democrats weep in anguish and, as said, pony up $81 million to show how dismayed they are over their new candidate.
Again, he’s not trying to win over liberals and progressives. Preaching to the choir is a different skill set.
And here’s an expert on that:
Miz Conway, she done claim dat Harris iz lazy an’ dat she mumbles. Ah speks we’ll be seein’ more o’ dat kinda talk rat soon.
In the meantime, here’s a guy who must have learned to drink diet soda at Yale.
He’s not racist. He’s just gone uptown. They drink the sweet, full-calorie stuff, back where he claims to have come from:
Comments 19
Comments are closed.