Comic Strip of the Day Editorial cartooning

CSotD: From the Mouths (and noses) of Babes

Remember that brief moment during the campaign, when progressives began describing Trump and his coterie as “weird”? It had tangible impact, but it seemed unpleasant and unconstructive so they quit saying it and focused, instead, on arguments that were more pleasant and constructive.

And that had no tangible impact.

Jones points out the number of people who, like Elon’s kid, would like Donald Trump to shush his mouth.

My guess is that Donald Trump does not like four-year-olds to wipe boogers on his desk and tell him to shush his mouth, nor does he like having a little kid publicly point out that his daddy bought Dear Leader and owns his ass.

Repeating the quote, then, seems like a pretty good way to at least drive a wedge between Musk and Trump, if not cause Dear Leader to go completely bonkers. But don’t hold your breath.

Progressives are already questioning what exactly the little tyke said and I’m sure will soon conclude that they probably misunderstood him and that, anyway, it wouldn’t be polite and constructive to keep hurling it in Trump’s face when instead they could discuss deep, meaningful, complex issues that nobody would understand or respond to.

However, not everyone is rolling over. Jones writes about the moment with his usual passion, and Charlie Sykes offers a more staid but strongly motivated analysis.

And the cartoonists are having fun, as seen in this

Juxtaposition of the Day

There have been several cartoons of Musk with Baby Trump on his shoulders, with Crowe winning the chance to represent them mostly on graphic detail. The point of them all is that Musk is in charge and Trump is just along for the ride.

My analysis is that neither one of these knuckleheads knows what he’s doing, but Musk is better at convincing powerful people that he does, while Trump is the carnival barker who ropes in the crowds. It’s a pretty powerful one-two combination.

But it does potentially rouse some jealousy, which brings us to Blitt’s take, in which Trump tries valiantly to keep up with his smoother partner.

It’s not easy: Barron’s mother has made it clear that she doesn’t want the kid exploited, Don Jr and Eric are obvious goofballs, Ivanka wants no further part in the farce and I doubt Trump could pick little what’s-her-name out of a lineup. She’s like the invisible daughter who refused to even appear in The Osbournes.

Speaking of young women who decline degrading opportunities, Brodner profiles Danielle Sassoon, a conservative prosecutor — a Federalist Society member and former Alito (Scalia) clerk — who was told to dismiss the case against NY Mayor Eric Adams despite the strong evidence against him and who wrote a blistering letter of resignation instead. A half dozen more prosecutors followed her lead before a quisling was found to do the deed.

The details are chilling, the letter is heroic, but my point is that among 53 GOP Senators, only Mitch McConnell voted against putting a Russian agent in charge of our intelligence services and a snake-oil screwball in charge of public health.

The rest must surely include a few with common sense, but apparently none who prize their honor and their country above their jobs. Terrified of being primaried, they go along with whatever they’re told to do.

Thank god not everyone is so craven and so obsessed with the trappings of position.

The Musk/Trump attempt to welcome white supremacist immigrants from South Africa has gotten horse laughs from that country, with Zapiro putting his fellow white South African in an appropriate uniform to go along with his obvious regret that apartheid ended.

One doesn’t expect Trump to know what’s going on down there, given that he probably couldn’t find South Africa on a map, but if Musk is unaware of how the land claims issue is being pursued, it may be that he gets his South African information from sources similar to those from which he gets information about Germany.

Madam & Eve has run several cartoons mocking Trump both for his weak grasp of the situation there and for his hypocrisy in objecting to land grabs when he has several on his own agenda.

Cartoonists are hard-pressed to keep up with the outrages: If firings of government employees aren’t being treated as photo-ops, arrests of immigrants are. NPR reports that some family members of people swept off to Guantanamo didn’t know they’d been arrested until they saw them in the media.

Nor is South Africa the only place the US is losing friends and support. As Adams notes, the Trump administration has managed to pick fights with the European Union on a variety of fronts, including insults to Denmark and offensive speeches by Pete Hegseth and JD Vance, while abandoning Ukraine to be trampled by a bloody-footed Vladimir Putin.

The gravest fault, Jennings and others say, is Trump’s willingness to bargain with Putin without including Ukraine in the talks. There are reports that the US asked Zelenskyy to sign over 50% of Ukraine’s mineral rights in exchange for some level of post-war security, which he declined to do.

While in this country, Davies wonders what the point would be of including Ukraine in the talks anyway, since Trump is so firmly in Putin’s thrall that, like the animals in the final chapter of Animal Farm, Zelenskyy looks from one to the other and realizes he can no longer tell them apart.

The withdrawal of USAID from the world — blocked for the moment but still on the docket — opens a world of opportunity for China and Russia, Kal suggests. He may overestimate Russia a bit, given the current state of their economy, but there are already reports of China stepping in to fill the gaps USAID has left in other countries.

An exiled Cambodian diplomat once told me that there’s no such thing as a “non-aligned nation,” that every small nation chooses one of the three major powers, by who can do the most for them and who can hurt them the least. For Lon Nol, it was the Americans. For the Khmer Rouge, it was China.

Our current administration seems determined to make everybody’s choices easier.

Previous Post
New Yorker Jeopardy Category
Next Post
Hey Kids! Comics! Read Book Love

Comments 12

  1. I’m sure it didn’t pass anyone’s notice that Border Czar/goblin Tom Homan bravely came out as gay on Fox News Friday morning when he threatened Eric Adams with anal rape if he didn’t fall in line with the adminstration’s immigration purge (itself an anal allegory by definition), unless I’m taking the phrase “”I’ll be back in New York City and we won’t be sitting on the couch. I’ll be in his office, up his butt” too literally. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that.)

    1. This is from Heather Cox Richardson’s email last night concerning the Adams case. It wasn’t a quisling, but a prosecutor ready to retire who offered to do the deed to save the jobs of his coworkers. I recommend everyone subscribing to Richardson’s emails, she has a firm grasp of how dire the situation is. https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/

      “The administration’s order to drop federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams in exchange for his cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has sparked a crisis in the Trump administration’s Department of Justice, led by President Trump’s own appointees.

      Yesterday that crisis led to multiple resignations from the department as acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York Danielle Sassoon resigned rather than drop the corruption charges. When the acting deputy attorney general of the Department of Justice, Emil Bove III, tried to do an end run around the Southern District of New York by taking the case to the Public Integrity Section in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and getting lawyer there to dismiss the case, at least five of them resigned as well.

      This crisis is really over whether the Department of Justice will defend the rule of law or declare loyalty to Trump alone. And the crisis is growing.

      Bove claims that administration officials did not make an arrangement with Adams to dismiss charges in exchange for his political support. But this morning, Adams and Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan undermined that assertion when they appeared together on the Fox News Channel. “If he doesn’t come through,” Homan said of Adams, “I’ll be back in New York City and we won’t be sitting on the couch. I’ll be in his office, up his butt saying, ‘Where the hell is the agreement we came to?’”

      Today, Hagan Scotten, the acting assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, resigned in a blistering letter to Bove, calling his justification for dropping the charges against Adams “transparently pretextual.” “[N]o system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges, or the stick of threatening to bring them again, to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives,” he wrote.

      Scotten was awarded two bronze stars as a troop commander in Iraq and clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts. He pointed out to Bove that “[t]here is a tradition in public service of resigning in a last-ditch effort to head off a serious mistake…. [A]ny assistant U.S. attorney would know that our laws and traditions do not allow using the prosecutorial power to influence other citizens, much less elected officials, in this way.”

      He continued: “If no lawyer within earshot of the President is willing to give him that advice, then I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion [to dismiss the case]. But it was never going to be me. Please consider this my resignation.”

      Also this morning, legal analyst Barb McQuade reported that “DOJ leadership has put all Public Integrity Section lawyers into a room with 1 hour to decide who will dismiss Adams indictment or else all will be fired.” “Sending them strength to stand by their oath, which is to support the Constitution, not the president’s political agenda,” she added. According to Jeremy Roebuck, Shayna Jacobs, Mark Berman, and Carol D. Leonnig of the Washington Post, one lawyer at the meeting said the discussion was “gut-wrenching” and “not anything any of us expected to see in America.”

      At first, they all agreed to resign together, but then Edward Sullivan, a career federal prosecutor approaching retirement, said he would sign the motion to dismiss the case in a bid to save the jobs of his colleagues.

      The crisis was reminiscent of the “Saturday Night Massacre” of October 20, 1973, when President Richard Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox after Cox subpoenaed a number of the tapes Nixon had recorded in the Oval Office concerning the break-in to the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters in the Washington, D.C., Watergate complex. Richardson and his deputy, William Ruckelshaus, refused to execute Nixon’s order and resigned in protest; it was only the third man at the Justice Department, Solicitor General Robert Bork, who was willing to carry out the order firing Cox.

      In that case, popular outrage at the resignations and firing forced Nixon to ask Bork—now acting attorney general—to appoint a new special prosecutor, Leon Jaworski, a Democrat who had voted for Nixon, on November 1. On November 17, Nixon assured the American people: “I am not a crook.”

  2. Knowing a bit about Mitch McConnell, I don’t get too enthused about any integrity in his No votes. He was itching for a way to slap at Trump, and this was a public and safe way to do it. He even had the satisfaction of knowing he got to Trump when Trump cut back at him about his polio as a child.

  3. If McConnell had integrity and disliked Trump, he would have urged his fellow Republican senators to vote for conviction in Trump’s impeachments. No, party over country every time.

    1. No, Mitch has no real integrity, just wanted to slap Trump down without getting any real blame for the outcome. The sad part really is that Collins and Murkowski folded.

    2. Well, y’know, no need to convict him in the Senate when we have a Judiciary for that. And no man is more individually responsible for rendering the judiciary incapable of performing that function than ol’ Moscow Mitch himself.

  4. Dt’s pattern the first time around was to have others cause severe damage, then throw them under the public opinion bus for it while never cleaning it up. M will know this and be planning to profit from the stolen data when he becomes the scapegoat. Notice that Dt does not inflict any other punishment on such people and later re-welcomes them unless they cross him. I wonder if Dt will realize that the perfect sculpting material for M will be congealed mush and begin calling him “mush-face” during the inevitable scape-goating phase?

    Since Dt is following Hitler’s playbook and sticks to patterns, one of his upcoming steps is going to be to ruin or destroy all the true conservatives. That was an early action by Hitler once he convinced Germany’s conservatives to treat reactionaryism as if it were just a different flavor of conservatism and got their help. Conversative leaders were the ones most likely to woe away his supporters so Hitler decimated them before acting against the opposing political parties. Republican leaders who helped Dt had best watch their backs. They already will have targets on them. Appeasing did not work in 1930s Germany and it will not work now. Republican leaders have a short window now to save themselves and reduce damage to our nation, but they have to grow backbones and stand up to Trump to do so.

    Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.

    1. Oh, the M/mushface here is Musk, not McConnell.

      1. And, yes, i really DO expect Trump to destroy most of the Republican leaders who are not reactionary parasites in one way or another within a year. Obviously, i could be wrong, but Trump has so tightly followed Hitler’s playbook that i am sure he already has placed the targets on them, just as Hitler did.

  5. The illustrated White House dialogue between Trump and Musk in “Madam & Eve” is a nice homage to Gary Trudeau and “Doonesbury”.

    1. They’ve used that format a lot through the years, but I like that they break it up with interior shots, which makes it an homage but also more their own.

Leave a Reply

Search

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a daily recap of the news posted each day.