<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iconix, Schulz family buy Peanuts for $175M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/</link>
	<description>The source for industry news for the professional cartoonist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:31:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Sandy</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-93155</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-93155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike - well put, my friend. However, I stand by my point. 

&quot;Well, first of all, American TV is notorious for keeping lame stuff around long after it has passed its creative expiration date.&quot;

Very true, but to my point, not 50-60 years, like a number of strips still populating the papers.

TV shows do indeed have a trail that can be specifically tracked, i.e., viewers, Nielsons, advertising etc...newspapers simply don&#039;t have anything &#039;trackable&#039; other than advertising revenue, sold by the column inch. That&#039;s it. 

To elaborate on your point, it would be nice if comics had specific advertising/sponsors attached to each strip, (like TV shows) i.e., Today&#039;s &quot;Blondie&quot; brought to you by Dial Soap! or Home Depot Presents &quot;Hi and Lois&quot;! and each reader of said strip was tracked, etc etc...Of course, newspapers would never do that, so it&#039;s really quite moot. 

Again, I stand by my basic point - which is to say, there&#039;s nothing worse than creative atrophy...no matter what medium.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; well put, my friend. However, I stand by my point. </p>
<p>&#8220;Well, first of all, American TV is notorious for keeping lame stuff around long after it has passed its creative expiration date.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very true, but to my point, not 50-60 years, like a number of strips still populating the papers.</p>
<p>TV shows do indeed have a trail that can be specifically tracked, i.e., viewers, Nielsons, advertising etc&#8230;newspapers simply don&#8217;t have anything &#8216;trackable&#8217; other than advertising revenue, sold by the column inch. That&#8217;s it. </p>
<p>To elaborate on your point, it would be nice if comics had specific advertising/sponsors attached to each strip, (like TV shows) i.e., Today&#8217;s &#8220;Blondie&#8221; brought to you by Dial Soap! or Home Depot Presents &#8220;Hi and Lois&#8221;! and each reader of said strip was tracked, etc etc&#8230;Of course, newspapers would never do that, so it&#8217;s really quite moot. </p>
<p>Again, I stand by my basic point &#8211; which is to say, there&#8217;s nothing worse than creative atrophy&#8230;no matter what medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peterson</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-93093</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 11:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-93093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I can only wonder what it would be like if TV operated like the syndicates… “I Love Lucy” would still be in production (in it’s 60th season…lol) and we would be on our 15th “Lucy” doing yet another riff on the classic “Vitameatamegamin” episode…&quot;

Well, first of all, American TV is notorious for keeping lame stuff around long after it has passed its creative expiration date. 

That said, the difference is that when NBC is showing &quot;Law &amp; Order: Tired Derivative Division,&quot; that&#039;s the only thing NBC is showing and the ratings make it clear how the show is doing. We&#039;ve seen examples of shows that had a loyal following being canceled because they had no marketable ratings -- a flood of letters may come from those loyal followers, but the network execs have the ratings book in their hands and can see that those impassioned viewers don&#039;t represent marketing value. Think &quot;Wonderfalls&quot; or &quot;My So-Called Life.&quot;

By contrast, nobody really knows how much quality audience any specific feature of a newspaper pulls in because content is undifferentiated. Even on the rare occasions that something jolts circulation -- say the addition of a new sports columnist or a change in when the TV section is inserted -- you don&#039;t know what demographic has come or gone. All you see are raw numbers, and to go deeper by commissioning a real market survey is very expensive and time-consuming.

And Lucille Ball did try new shows after &quot;I Love Lucy&quot; ended, and the loveable screwball redhead was pretty unwatchable. IIRC, the sitcom lasted a couple of years and the variety show sank like a stone. 

TV ratings aren&#039;t perfect, but they sure beat putting your fate in the hands of editors who don&#039;t understand marketing, demographics or business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can only wonder what it would be like if TV operated like the syndicates… “I Love Lucy” would still be in production (in it’s 60th season…lol) and we would be on our 15th “Lucy” doing yet another riff on the classic “Vitameatamegamin” episode…&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, first of all, American TV is notorious for keeping lame stuff around long after it has passed its creative expiration date. </p>
<p>That said, the difference is that when NBC is showing &#8220;Law &amp; Order: Tired Derivative Division,&#8221; that&#8217;s the only thing NBC is showing and the ratings make it clear how the show is doing. We&#8217;ve seen examples of shows that had a loyal following being canceled because they had no marketable ratings &#8212; a flood of letters may come from those loyal followers, but the network execs have the ratings book in their hands and can see that those impassioned viewers don&#8217;t represent marketing value. Think &#8220;Wonderfalls&#8221; or &#8220;My So-Called Life.&#8221;</p>
<p>By contrast, nobody really knows how much quality audience any specific feature of a newspaper pulls in because content is undifferentiated. Even on the rare occasions that something jolts circulation &#8212; say the addition of a new sports columnist or a change in when the TV section is inserted &#8212; you don&#8217;t know what demographic has come or gone. All you see are raw numbers, and to go deeper by commissioning a real market survey is very expensive and time-consuming.</p>
<p>And Lucille Ball did try new shows after &#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221; ended, and the loveable screwball redhead was pretty unwatchable. IIRC, the sitcom lasted a couple of years and the variety show sank like a stone. </p>
<p>TV ratings aren&#8217;t perfect, but they sure beat putting your fate in the hands of editors who don&#8217;t understand marketing, demographics or business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Willis</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-93091</link>
		<dc:creator>J Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 07:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-93091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where&#039;s Dilbert in all of this mess?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s Dilbert in all of this mess?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Sandy</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-92991</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-92991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would much rather &#039;reruns&#039; of a strip as iconic as Peanuts than have an endless &#039;team&#039; of creators banging out new strips. Thank God Schulz made sure no one would do that. As for the &#039;zombie&#039; strips populating the newspapers, I can only wonder what it would be like if TV operated like the syndicates... &quot;I Love Lucy&quot; would still be in production (in it&#039;s 60th season...lol) and we would be on our 15th &quot;Lucy&quot; doing yet another riff on the  classic &quot;Vitameatamegamin&quot; episode...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would much rather &#8216;reruns&#8217; of a strip as iconic as Peanuts than have an endless &#8216;team&#8217; of creators banging out new strips. Thank God Schulz made sure no one would do that. As for the &#8216;zombie&#8217; strips populating the newspapers, I can only wonder what it would be like if TV operated like the syndicates&#8230; &#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221; would still be in production (in it&#8217;s 60th season&#8230;lol) and we would be on our 15th &#8220;Lucy&#8221; doing yet another riff on the  classic &#8220;Vitameatamegamin&#8221; episode&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Stephens</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-92956</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-92956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[20% looks fantastic to me - most of us non-billionaires see only 5-8% royalties on average...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20% looks fantastic to me &#8211; most of us non-billionaires see only 5-8% royalties on average&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weber Jr.</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-92955</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weber Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-92955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Robert,
True, no zombie strip, but there has been licensing art created by cartoonists other than Sparky over the years. A wonderful cartoonist and friend of mine tried out for an account assignment  about 25 years ago. The job went to someone else.
I don&#039;t know how often this was done, but it did happen.
Then there is the Peanuts comic books published in the 1950s and early 1960s. Sparky drew the first book. After that Jim Sasseville drew some and Dale Hale took over for the rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert,<br />
True, no zombie strip, but there has been licensing art created by cartoonists other than Sparky over the years. A wonderful cartoonist and friend of mine tried out for an account assignment  about 25 years ago. The job went to someone else.<br />
I don&#8217;t know how often this was done, but it did happen.<br />
Then there is the Peanuts comic books published in the 1950s and early 1960s. Sparky drew the first book. After that Jim Sasseville drew some and Dale Hale took over for the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Gidley</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-92954</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Gidley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-92954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Darryl,

No, Sparky made it very, very clear that he didn&#039;t want a zombie strip. No new Peanuts. 

Even the licensing folks don&#039;t allow new drawings of Peanuts characters. If you use them in your advertising, you have to use a drawing that Sparky made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darryl,</p>
<p>No, Sparky made it very, very clear that he didn&#8217;t want a zombie strip. No new Peanuts. </p>
<p>Even the licensing folks don&#8217;t allow new drawings of Peanuts characters. If you use them in your advertising, you have to use a drawing that Sparky made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Scullin</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-92940</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Scullin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-92940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure what it means but I hope in the end it&#039;s good for the Schultz family.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what it means but I hope in the end it&#8217;s good for the Schultz family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl Heine</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-92904</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl Heine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-92904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But no plans to do new Peanuts episodes with a new artist since it has been a decade since the last new Peanuts strip and a decade since Charles Schulz died?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But no plans to do new Peanuts episodes with a new artist since it has been a decade since the last new Peanuts strip and a decade since Charles Schulz died?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob T</title>
		<link>http://dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2010/04/27/iconix-schulz-family-buy-peanuts-for-175m/#comment-92884</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycartoonist.com/?p=6972#comment-92884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh... not syndication that&#039;s UFS, UMS does licensing...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh&#8230; not syndication that&#8217;s UFS, UMS does licensing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
